On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > During development, I often times have powerpc in the name of the compiler. > This trips up several tests that want to make sure the various pow > optimizations are done and the pow function is not called, since "powerpc" is > in the compiler identification string. > > I committed the following patch as obvious, after doing build/compare. > > [gcc/testsuite] > 2012-11-02 Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-1.c: Pass -fno-ident to eliminate > failures in case 'pow', such as 'powerpc' is used in the compiler > version name. > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-2.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-3.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-4.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-5.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-7.c: Likewise. > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-8.c: Likewise. > * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr46728-6.c: Likewise.
I see similar failures on AIX, but I think that "powerpc" appears in other strings in XCOFF. But thanks for cleaning up these spurious failures in the testsuite. I want the testsuite failures to be meaningful and accurate. Thanks, David
