On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Wei Mi <w...@google.com> wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion! > > The planned svn commands will be: > > svn mv libasan libsanitizer > svn add libsanitizer/asan > svn add libsanitizer/tsan
Probably keep the tsan creation out of this patch. David > cd libsanitizer > for i in `ls asan_*`; do > svn mv $i asan/$i > done > > Then apply the two patches attached on top of that. patch.1.txt is to > handle the toplevel configure and Makefile changes. patch.2.txt is to > handle the configure and Makefile changes in libsanitizer. > > Thanks, > Wei. > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> wrote: >> that sounds good to me. >> >> David >> >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 01:19:42PM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote: >>>> Will it be easier if you just rolled back your previous libasan >>>> library changes, and resubmit it with the restructured directory? >>> >>> I think better would be if you didn't apply it as a patch with lots of svn >>> add/svn rm commands, but instead just svn mv the directory or files. >>> So it would be better if you could post the planned svn commands >>> and the patch that would be applied on top of that. >>> >>> Jakub
