On 10/26/2012 01:37 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
  cp_next_tokens_can_be_std_attribute_p (cp_parser *parser)
  {
-  return cp_nth_tokens_can_be_std_attribute_p (parser, 1);
+  cp_token *token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
+
+  return (cxx_dialect >= cxx0x
+         (token->type == CPP_KEYWORD && token->keyword == RID_ALIGNAS)
+         || cp_nth_tokens_can_be_std_attribute_p (parser, 1));

Shouldn't this change be in cp_nth_tokens... rather than here?

Jason

Reply via email to