yes -- there is no need to change any developer only internal names.
David
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 08:48:10AM -0700, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Yes.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Kostya Serebryany <k...@google.com> wrote:
>> >> One thing I overlooked before.
>> >> In the gcc patch we are using -fasan flag name, while clang uses
>> >> -f[no-]address-sanitizer
>> >> (it used to be -fasan in early patches, but was renamed before submitting
>> >> to
>> >> trunk).
>> >> Do we want to be flag-compatible with clang (I'd say yes)?
>> >
>> > I agree.
>
> I agree too, but I wouldn't rename -fdump-tree-asan{,0} etc., just the main
> switch.
>
> Jakub
