From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:34:00 +0100
> David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes: >> I'll add the straightforward check to sparc's legitimate_address_p, >> but I'm really surprised you never hit this case in your testing. > > Adding the check sounds like the right thing to do. And remember > that the merge was only for the core LRA code and x86 bits. > The LRA branch has patches to e.g. rs6000's address handling; > it's just something that needs to be done when "porting" to LRA. Fair enough. FWIW, I currently have the whole 32-bit sparc build and testsuite down to no regressions.
