On 10/23/2012 03:43 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:34:46PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
I think it should be backported to 4.7, perhaps with a few days delay after the
trunk commit.
Do we even have debug statements after control flow statements?
They shouldn't be there, so if you just give up the same way for gsi_stmt
NULL as well as non-control stmt, it shouldn't make a difference.
So last_stmt might be just shorter to type and more commonly used, nothing
more.
From looking at the existing code and last_stmt; for the cases we care
about, they ought to be equivalent.
Using last_stmt seems marginally clearer. I'll go ahead and make that
change after the usual bootstrap & test cycle.
jeff
