On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> Hi,
> here is updated patch with the comments.  The fortran failures turned out to 
> be
> funny interaction in between this patch and my other change that hoped that
> loop closed SSA is closed on VOPs, but it is not.
> 
> Regtested x86_64-linux, bootstrap in progress, OK?

Ok for trunk.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Honza
> 
>       * tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (record_estimate): Do not try to lower
>       the bound of non-is_exit statements.
>       (maybe_lower_iteration_bound): Do it here.
>       (estimate_numbers_of_iterations_loop): Call it.
>       
>       * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr54937.c: New testcase.
>       * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-2.c: Update.
> Index: tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tree-ssa-loop-niter.c     (revision 192632)
> +++ tree-ssa-loop-niter.c     (working copy)
> @@ -2535,7 +2541,6 @@ record_estimate (struct loop *loop, tree
>                gimple at_stmt, bool is_exit, bool realistic, bool upper)
>  {
>    double_int delta;
> -  edge exit;
>  
>    if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
>      {
> @@ -2570,14 +2577,10 @@ record_estimate (struct loop *loop, tree
>      }
>  
>    /* Update the number of iteration estimates according to the bound.
> -     If at_stmt is an exit or dominates the single exit from the loop,
> -     then the loop latch is executed at most BOUND times, otherwise
> -     it can be executed BOUND + 1 times.  */
> -  exit = single_exit (loop);
> -  if (is_exit
> -      || (exit != NULL
> -       && dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS,
> -                          exit->src, gimple_bb (at_stmt))))
> +     If at_stmt is an exit then the loop latch is executed at most BOUND 
> times,
> +     otherwise it can be executed BOUND + 1 times.  We will lower the 
> estimate
> +     later if such statement must be executed on last iteration  */
> +  if (is_exit)
>      delta = double_int_zero;
>    else
>      delta = double_int_one;
> @@ -2953,6 +2956,110 @@ gcov_type_to_double_int (gcov_type val)
>    return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/* See if every path cross the loop goes through a statement that is known
> +   to not execute at the last iteration. In that case we can decrese 
> iteration
> +   count by 1.  */
> +
> +static void
> +maybe_lower_iteration_bound (struct loop *loop)
> +{
> +  pointer_set_t *not_executed_last_iteration = pointer_set_create ();
> +  struct nb_iter_bound *elt;
> +  bool found_exit = false;
> +  VEC (basic_block, heap) *queue = NULL;
> +  bitmap visited;
> +
> +  /* Collect all statements with interesting (i.e. lower than
> +     nb_iterations_upper_bound) bound on them. 
> +
> +     TODO: Due to the way record_estimate choose estimates to store, the 
> bounds
> +     will be always nb_iterations_upper_bound-1.  We can change this to 
> record
> +     also statements not dominating the loop latch and update the walk bellow
> +     to the shortest path algorthm.  */
> +  for (elt = loop->bounds; elt; elt = elt->next)
> +    {
> +      if (!elt->is_exit
> +       && elt->bound.ult (loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound))
> +     {
> +       if (!not_executed_last_iteration)
> +         not_executed_last_iteration = pointer_set_create ();
> +       pointer_set_insert (not_executed_last_iteration, elt->stmt);
> +     }
> +    }
> +  if (!not_executed_last_iteration)
> +    return;
> +
> +  /* Start DFS walk in the loop header and see if we can reach the
> +     loop latch or any of the exits (including statements with side
> +     effects that may terminate the loop otherwise) without visiting
> +     any of the statements known to have undefined effect on the last
> +     iteration.  */
> +  VEC_safe_push (basic_block, heap, queue, loop->header);
> +  visited = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
> +  bitmap_set_bit (visited, loop->header->index);
> +  found_exit = false;
> +
> +  do
> +    {
> +      basic_block bb = VEC_pop (basic_block, queue);
> +      gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
> +      bool stmt_found = false;
> +
> +      /* Loop for possible exits and statements bounding the execution.  */
> +      for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
> +     {
> +       gimple stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> +       if (pointer_set_contains (not_executed_last_iteration, stmt))
> +         {
> +           stmt_found = true;
> +           break;
> +         }
> +       if (gimple_has_side_effects (stmt))
> +         {
> +           found_exit = true;
> +           break;
> +         }
> +     }
> +      if (found_exit)
> +     break;
> +
> +      /* If no bounding statement is found, continue the walk.  */
> +      if (!stmt_found)
> +     {
> +          edge e;
> +          edge_iterator ei;
> +
> +          FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
> +         {
> +           if (loop_exit_edge_p (loop, e)
> +               || e == loop_latch_edge (loop))
> +             {
> +               found_exit = true;
> +               break;
> +             }
> +           if (bitmap_set_bit (visited, e->dest->index))
> +             VEC_safe_push (basic_block, heap, queue, e->dest);
> +         }
> +     }
> +    }
> +  while (VEC_length (basic_block, queue) && !found_exit);
> +
> +  /* If every path through the loop reach bounding statement before exit,
> +     then we know the last iteration of the loop will have undefined effect
> +     and we can decrease number of iterations.  */
> +    
> +  if (!found_exit)
> +    {
> +      if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> +     fprintf (dump_file, "Reducing loop iteration estimate by 1; "
> +              "undefined statement must be executed at the last 
> iteration.\n");
> +      record_niter_bound (loop, loop->nb_iterations_upper_bound - 
> double_int_one,
> +                       false, true);
> +    }
> +  BITMAP_FREE (visited);
> +  VEC_free (basic_block, heap, queue);
> +}
> +
>  /* Records estimates on numbers of iterations of LOOP.  If USE_UNDEFINED_P
>     is true also use estimates derived from undefined behavior.  */
>  
> @@ -2996,6 +3103,8 @@ estimate_numbers_of_iterations_loop (str
>  
>    infer_loop_bounds_from_undefined (loop);
>  
> +  maybe_lower_iteration_bound (loop);
> +
>    /* If we have a measured profile, use it to estimate the number of
>       iterations.  */
>    if (loop->header->count != 0)
> Index: testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr54937.c
> ===================================================================
> --- testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr54937.c (revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr54937.c (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +
> +void exit (int);
> +void abort (void);
> +int a[1];
> +void (*terminate_me)(int);
> +
> +__attribute__((noinline,noclone))
> +t(int c)
> +{ int i;
> +  for (i=0;i<c;i++)
> +    {
> +      if (i)
> +       terminate_me(0);
> +      a[i]=0;
> +    }
> +}
> +main()
> +{
> +  terminate_me = exit;
> +  t(100);
> +  abort();
> +}
> Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-2.c
> ===================================================================
> --- testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-2.c     (revision 192632)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-2.c     (working copy)
> @@ -12,5 +12,5 @@ test(int c)
>      }
>  }
>  /* We are not able to get rid of the final conditional because the loop has 
> two exits.  */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Unrolled loop 1 completely .duplicated 2 
> times.." "cunroll"} } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Unrolled loop 1 completely .duplicated 1 
> times.." "cunroll"} } */
>  /* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "cunroll" } } */
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE / SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend

Reply via email to