On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > This patch (r192676) is probably causing > > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memmove-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/mempcpy-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memset-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/snprintf-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/stpcpy-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/stpncpy-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcat-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strcpy-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strncat-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strncpy-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -Os > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsprintf-chk.c execution, -Os > > on i?86 (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-10/msg02350.html ).
Confirmed, now PR55030. I'll revert that patch pending further investigation. Feel free to open PR's whenever something like this happens. brgds, H-P
