On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 23:53 -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > My biggest problem is ESL. I should use simpler phrases.
Heh, I'm not sure compiler speak qualifies as English. :) > Is the following comment better? > > Presence of any pseudo in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGE does not affect value > of insn_bitmap of the corresponding lra_reg_info. That is because we > don't need to reload pseudos in CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGEs. So if we > process only insns in the insn_bitmap of given pseudo here, we can miss > the pseudo in some CALL_INSN_FUNCTION_USAGEs. Sure, that's better. Thanks. Peter
