On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > If you can figure out a better name for the function we should > > probably move it to cfganal.c > > It looks like my previous e-mail about this appears to have gone got > somehow, so retry: > > Your my_rev_post_order_compute is simply inverted_post_order_compute. > The only difference is that you'll want to ignore EXIT_BLOCK, which is > always added to the list by inverted_post_order_compute.
Indeed. inverted_post_order_compute seems to handle a CFG without infinite-loop and noreturns connected to exit though. Possibly that's why it doesn't care for not handling entry/exit. I'm testing a patch to use inverted_post_order_compute from PRE. Richard.
