On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 04:17:19PM +0200, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Per our discussion, nonzero_p() has always been a bit insane. It only > returns true for ~[0,0] so even [13,13] is considered false. > Introduce contains_zero_p(), which from the looks of it, we've already > been hand crafting, as direct nonzero_p() calls were few. > > How does this look?
BTW, I ran my usual LAPACK source files through each patch independently, and there are no changes to assembly, so in theory this whole set is surprisingly a non-functional change. Aldy
