On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 09:31:17AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > The following testcase is miscompiled since my r16-1108 change.
> > The problem is if we handle a reverse of a narrowing float to float cast
> > (in the example there are double -> float and long double -> double
> > cast) and the lhs range is [-inf, -inf] or [+inf, +inf] (note, regardless
> > of whether some NaNs are allowed or not, so not necessarily
> > lhs.known_isinf ()), then handling that range in the wider type also
> > as [-inf, -inf] or [+inf, +inf] is wrong, e.g. for the double -> float
> > conversion, [-inf, -0x0.ffffff8p+128] double range could map to just
> > that [-inf, -inf].  We have already float_widen_lhs_range function
> > but that just extends the range by +/-1ulp or 0.5ulp if the bounds
> > are finite.  If the range isn't singleton (except for optional NaN),
> > then the minimum (or maximum) finite is already in the range, so this just
> > extends the case where they are singleton.
> > I don't know how to portably figure out that 0x0.ffffff8p+128 for
> > double -> float (especially when in float_widen_lhs_range we don't know
> > yet the wider type), so the patch just uses the +/-1ulp extension (i.e.
> > [-inf, min_finite] or [+inf, max_finite] case.

On a second thought, this actually isn't specific to just reverse of
narrowing float to float casts, it is a problem for any other reverse binary
ops too.

E.g. the following testcase is miscompiled at -O2 since r13-3926-gd4c2f1d376da
(but works with -O0).  The lhs of the addition is [-inf, -inf], one of its
operand is [-1e304, -1e300] and we think the other operand has to be
[-inf, -inf].  That is obviously wrong, even much larger operands can result
in -inf, anything below -DBL_MAX + -1e300 where x + -1e300 doesn't round to
-DBL_MAX or higher but to -inf.

So, the following patch just widens lb of +inf and ub of -inf by 1ulp for
all callers (and thus doesn't need the also_inf argument.

Ok for trunk/16.2 if it passes bootstrap/regtest?

2026-07-30  Jakub Jelinek  <[email protected]>

        PR tree-optimization/126464
        * range-op-float.cc (float_widen_lhs_range): Remove also_inf
        argument, replace its uses as if it was always true.
        (operator_cast::op1_range): Don't pass third argument to
        float_widen_lhs_range.

        * gcc.dg/torture/pr126464.c: New test.

--- gcc/range-op-float.cc.jj    2026-07-30 09:56:33.399864195 +0200
+++ gcc/range-op-float.cc       2026-07-30 11:24:54.504217764 +0200
@@ -2374,14 +2374,14 @@ zero_to_inf_range (REAL_VALUE_TYPE &lb,
    in each direction.  See PR109008 for more details.  */
 
 static frange
-float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const frange &lhs, bool also_inf = false)
+float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const frange &lhs)
 {
   frange ret = lhs;
   if (lhs.known_isnan ())
     return ret;
   REAL_VALUE_TYPE lb = lhs.lower_bound ();
   REAL_VALUE_TYPE ub = lhs.upper_bound ();
-  if (real_isfinite (&lb) || (also_inf && !real_isneg (&lb)))
+  if (real_isfinite (&lb) || !real_isneg (&lb))
     {
       frange_nextafter (TYPE_MODE (type), lb, dconstninf);
       if (real_isinf (&lb))
@@ -2397,7 +2397,7 @@ float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const
        }
       if (!flag_rounding_math
          && !MODE_COMPOSITE_P (TYPE_MODE (type))
-         && (!also_inf || real_isfinite (&lhs.lower_bound ())))
+         && real_isfinite (&lhs.lower_bound ()))
        {
          /* If not -frounding-math nor IBM double double, actually widen
             just by 0.5ulp rather than 1ulp.  */
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const
          real_arithmetic (&lb, RDIV_EXPR, &tem, &dconst2);
        }
     }
-  if (real_isfinite (&ub) || (also_inf && real_isneg (&ub)))
+  if (real_isfinite (&ub) || real_isneg (&ub))
     {
       frange_nextafter (TYPE_MODE (type), ub, dconstinf);
       if (real_isinf (&ub))
@@ -2417,7 +2417,7 @@ float_widen_lhs_range (tree type, const
        }
       if (!flag_rounding_math
          && !MODE_COMPOSITE_P (TYPE_MODE (type))
-         && (!also_inf || real_isfinite (&lhs.upper_bound ())))
+         && real_isfinite (&lhs.upper_bound ()))
        {
          /* If not -frounding-math nor IBM double double, actually widen
             just by 0.5ulp rather than 1ulp.  */
@@ -3026,7 +3026,7 @@ operator_cast::op1_range (frange &r, tre
   else
     {
       rm = true;
-      wlhs = float_widen_lhs_range (lhs_type, lhs, true);
+      wlhs = float_widen_lhs_range (lhs_type, lhs);
     }
   auto save_flag_rounding_math = flag_rounding_math;
   flag_rounding_math = rm;
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr126464.c.jj  2026-07-30 11:23:07.024598145 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr126464.c     2026-07-30 11:22:55.461746647 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/126464 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+
+#if __DBL_MANT_DIG__ == 53 && __DBL_MAX_10_EXP__ == 308 && __DBL_HAS_INFINITY__
+[[gnu::noipa]] double
+foo (double x, double y)
+{
+  if (y >= -1e304 && y <= -1e300)
+    {
+      if (x + y == -__builtin_inf ())
+       return x * 0.5;
+    }
+  return x;
+}
+#endif
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+#if __DBL_MANT_DIG__ == 53 && __DBL_MAX_10_EXP__ == 308 && __DBL_HAS_INFINITY__
+  if (foo (-__builtin_inf (), -1e303) != -__builtin_inf ())
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  if (foo (-1.797693134862e308, -1e303) != -1.797693134862e308 / 2.0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+#endif
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to