"Robin Dapp" <[email protected]> writes:
>> Yeah, the aarch64 change looks good to me (but I shouldn't approve it).
>>
>> And sorry for the late reply.  Since like you said the lower-subreg
>> changes came from whack-a-mole, I kind-of needed to play the same game
>> to review.
>
> No worries, the time frame allowed me to refine my year-old reassoc patch 
> that 
> is now supposed to pick up the crumbs the newly constrained (to
> non-overflowing
> types) backprop patch leaves behind.  Luckily, it appears useful for both the 
> new test case as well as the old one.  Despite my concerns, bit-level 
> backprop 
> won't cause too much havoc on the IR and reassoc can still work.  I'll send a 
> respun "unsigned" backprop version at some point.
>
>> An aarch64 bootstrap & regression test succeeded for me except for:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/fold_to_highpart_6.c
>> check-function-bodies test_256b_type
>>
>> with:
>>
>> 1. the read_complex_part change (already approved)
>> 2. the expemd.cc changes (already approved)
>> 3. the interesting_mode_p change
>> 4. the change below
>> 5. the aarch64 change
>>
>> Do (3) and (4) work for you too, or do you still need some of the other
>> lower-subreg changes from your patch?  Could you give an example if so?
>
>> Could you list some of the testcases that fail for RISC-V without the
>> emit_move_insn change?  (Maybe you already did, sorry.)
>>
>> I won't be able to reply for a week or so.  I'll have a look at
>> fold_to_highpart_6.c when I get back.
>
> Not for the first time, messaging back and forth with you seems to make
> issues disappear into thin air :)
> I retested and indeed the emit_move_insn change looks redundant now.  The
> lower-subreg issues I only ever observed on aarch64, not on riscv.  And your 
> lower-subreg change is at a far better spot than my distributed changes,  I 
> just wonder why I didn't find that spot :/
>
> Thus, the attached v3 incorporates (1) - (5) and also includes the test case
> of the second patch, just without the no-spill check.
>
> So far I only regtested it on riscv.  aarch64, x86, and power10 are still
> running.  As you wanted to look into fold_to_highpart_6.c anyway,  I'll
> report back if there's any surprises from these runs.

The fold_to_highpart_6.c failure was due to a difference in our aarch64.cc
patches.  I was testing with:

  if (!aarch64_sve_vg.is_constant ())

removed entirely, rather than replaced with VECTOR_MODE_P.  That had the
effect of including OImode, CImode, and XImode.  Given that:

(a) after Jonathan's work, all real structures should now be using
    vector modes and

(b) these *Imodes are presented as normal integer modes and so can
    be used for target-independent integer work (as here)

I think your version is more correct.  Of course, both versions are
likely to have unfortunate corner cases, just as the status quo does.

Now that the port defines sub-64-bit vector modes (a new thing), I think:

> @@ -3060,20 +3060,17 @@ aarch64_regmode_natural_size (machine_mode mode)
>    /* The natural size for SVE data modes is one SVE data vector,
>       and similarly for predicates.  We can't independently modify
>       anything smaller than that.  */
> -  /* ??? For now, only do this for variable-width SVE registers.
> -     Doing it for constant-sized registers breaks lower-subreg.cc.  */
> -  /* ??? And once that's fixed, we should probably have similar
> -     code for Advanced SIMD.  */
> -  if (!aarch64_sve_vg.is_constant ())
> -    {
> -      /* REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE influences general subreg validity rules,
> -      so we need to handle memory-only modes as well.  */
> +  if (VECTOR_MODE_P (mode))
> +    {
>        unsigned int vec_flags = aarch64_classify_vector_memory_mode (mode);
>        if (vec_flags & VEC_SVE_PRED)
>       return BYTES_PER_SVE_PRED;
>        if (vec_flags & VEC_SVE_DATA)
>       return BYTES_PER_SVE_VECTOR;
> +      if (vec_flags & VEC_ADVSIMD)
> +     return exact_div (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), aarch64_ldn_stn_vectors (mode));

...this should be MAXed with UNITS_PER_WORD.

The patch LGTM otherwise, but someone else should approve the target-
independent and lower-subreg changes.

Thanks,
Richard


>      }
> +
>    return UNITS_PER_WORD;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> index 431aaa1e761..4e5f011dc61 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> @@ -4011,14 +4011,10 @@ shuffle_even_odd_patterns (struct expand_vec_perm_d 
> *d)
>  
>    /* When the element width is smaller than the greatest ELEN, we can use two
>       vnsrl instructions, each extracting the even/odd elements of one source,
> -     and a vslideup instruction to merge them into one vector.
> -
> -     PR target/124996: VLS mode subregs larger than what
> -     riscv_regmode_natural_size allows cause a memory roundtrip.  Therefore, 
> for
> -     now, we only do this when the mode size is no greater than the natural 
> size
> -     of the register.  Once this is fixed, the condition should be replaced 
> by
> -     the ELEN condition.  */
> -  if (known_le (GET_MODE_SIZE (vmode), riscv_regmode_natural_size (vmode)))
> +     and a vslideup instruction to merge them into one vector.  */
> +  unsigned int max_elen = TARGET_VECTOR_ELEN_64 ? 64 : 32;
> +  if (known_le (GET_MODE_SIZE (vmode), riscv_regmode_natural_size (vmode))
> +      && GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE_INNER (vmode)) * 2 <= max_elen)
>      {
>        unsigned int elen = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE_INNER (vmode));
>        unsigned int elen2x = elen * 2;
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> index d31d4a8aeab..26aacd0df36 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> @@ -13302,9 +13302,6 @@ riscv_regmode_natural_size (machine_mode mode)
>    /* The natural size for RVV data modes is one RVV data vector,
>       and similarly for predicates.  We can't independently modify
>       anything smaller than that.  */
> -  /* ??? For now, only do this for variable-width RVV registers.
> -     Doing it for constant-sized registers breaks lower-subreg.c.  */
> -
>    if (riscv_vector_mode_p (mode))
>      {
>        poly_uint64 size = GET_MODE_SIZE (mode);
> @@ -13328,6 +13325,8 @@ riscv_regmode_natural_size (machine_mode mode)
>          return minimum size between vector register size and scalar
>          register size.  */
>       return MIN (size.to_constant (), UNITS_PER_WORD);
> +      else
> +     return TARGET_MIN_VLEN / BITS_PER_WORD;
>      }
>    return UNITS_PER_WORD;
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/expmed.cc b/gcc/expmed.cc
> index da1b5b63287..c4db5ef10bd 100644
> --- a/gcc/expmed.cc
> +++ b/gcc/expmed.cc
> @@ -858,12 +858,16 @@ store_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, poly_uint64 bitsize, 
> poly_uint64 bitnum,
>       valid for integral modes.  */
>    opt_scalar_int_mode op0_mode = int_mode_for_mode (GET_MODE (op0));
>    scalar_int_mode imode;
> +  bool need_stack_p = false;
>    if (!op0_mode.exists (&imode) || imode != GET_MODE (op0))
>      {
>        if (MEM_P (op0))
>       op0 = adjust_bitfield_address_size (op0, op0_mode.else_blk (),
>                                           0, MEM_SIZE (op0));
> -      else if (!op0_mode.exists ())
> +      else if (!op0_mode.exists ()
> +            || maybe_lt
> +            ((unsigned) UNITS_PER_WORD,
> +             (poly_uint64) REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0))))
>       {
>         if (ibitnum == 0
>             && known_eq (ibitsize, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE (op0)))
> @@ -876,17 +880,29 @@ store_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, poly_uint64 bitsize, 
> poly_uint64 bitnum,
>           }
>         if (!fallback_p)
>           return false;
> -       rtx temp = assign_stack_temp (GET_MODE (op0),
> -                                     GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0)));
> -       emit_move_insn (temp, op0);
> -       store_bit_field_1 (temp, bitsize, bitnum, 0, 0, fieldmode, value,
> -                          reverse, fallback_p, undefined_p);
> -       emit_move_insn (op0, temp);
> -       return true;
> +       need_stack_p = true;
>       }
>        else
>       op0 = gen_lowpart (op0_mode.require (), op0);
>      }
> +  else if (!MEM_P (op0)
> +        && maybe_lt ((unsigned) UNITS_PER_WORD,
> +                     (poly_uint64) REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0))))
> +    need_stack_p = true;
> +
> +  /* With or without punning we might be faced with a mode that we cannot
> +     split into words.  If so, spill OP0 to the stack and recurse.
> +     This happens at most once.  */
> +  if (need_stack_p)
> +    {
> +      rtx temp = assign_stack_temp (GET_MODE (op0),
> +                                 GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0)));
> +      emit_move_insn (temp, op0);
> +      store_bit_field_1 (temp, bitsize, bitnum, 0, 0, fieldmode, value,
> +                      reverse, fallback_p, undefined_p);
> +      emit_move_insn (op0, temp);
> +      return true;
> +    }
>  
>    return store_integral_bit_field (op0, op0_mode, ibitsize, ibitnum,
>                                  bitregion_start, bitregion_end,
> @@ -1008,7 +1024,9 @@ store_integral_bit_field (rtx op0, opt_scalar_int_mode 
> op0_mode,
>             in BLKmode to handle unaligned memory references and to shift the
>             last chunk right on big-endian machines if need be.  */
>         rtx value_word
> -         = fieldmode == BLKmode
> +         = (fieldmode == BLKmode
> +            || maybe_lt ((unsigned) UNITS_PER_WORD,
> +                         (poly_uint64) REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE (value_mode)))
>             ? extract_bit_field (value, new_bitsize, wordnum * BITS_PER_WORD,
>                                  1, NULL_RTX, word_mode, word_mode, false,
>                                  NULL)
> @@ -1834,12 +1852,16 @@ extract_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, poly_uint64 
> bitsize, poly_uint64 bitnum,
>       if we aren't.  */
>    opt_scalar_int_mode op0_mode = int_mode_for_mode (GET_MODE (op0));
>    scalar_int_mode imode;
> +  bool need_stack_p = false;
>    if (!op0_mode.exists (&imode) || imode != GET_MODE (op0))
>      {
>        if (MEM_P (op0))
>       op0 = adjust_bitfield_address_size (op0, op0_mode.else_blk (),
>                                           0, MEM_SIZE (op0));
> -      else if (op0_mode.exists (&imode))
> +      else if (op0_mode.exists (&imode)
> +            && known_ge
> +            ((unsigned) UNITS_PER_WORD,
> +             (poly_uint64) REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0))))
>       {
>         op0 = gen_lowpart (imode, op0);
>  
> @@ -1849,12 +1871,19 @@ extract_bit_field_1 (rtx str_rtx, poly_uint64 
> bitsize, poly_uint64 bitnum,
>           op0 = force_reg (imode, op0);
>       }
>        else
> -     {
> -       poly_int64 size = GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0));
> -       rtx mem = assign_stack_temp (GET_MODE (op0), size);
> -       emit_move_insn (mem, op0);
> -       op0 = adjust_bitfield_address_size (mem, BLKmode, 0, size);
> -     }
> +     need_stack_p = true;
> +    }
> +  else if (!MEM_P (op0)
> +        && maybe_lt ((unsigned) UNITS_PER_WORD,
> +                     (poly_uint64) REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0))))
> +    need_stack_p = true;
> +
> +  if (need_stack_p)
> +    {
> +      poly_int64 size = GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (op0));
> +      rtx mem = assign_stack_temp (GET_MODE (op0), size);
> +      emit_move_insn (mem, op0);
> +      op0 = adjust_bitfield_address_size (mem, BLKmode, 0, size);
>      }
>  
>    /* ??? We currently assume TARGET is at least as big as BITSIZE.
> diff --git a/gcc/expr.cc b/gcc/expr.cc
> index f42aab21272..d39bb84d5da 100644
> --- a/gcc/expr.cc
> +++ b/gcc/expr.cc
> @@ -4176,9 +4176,6 @@ read_complex_part (rtx cplx, bool imag_p)
>                                    imag_p ? GET_MODE_SIZE (imode) : 0);
>        if (ret)
>          return ret;
> -      else
> -     /* simplify_gen_subreg may fail for sub-word MEMs.  */
> -     gcc_assert (MEM_P (cplx) && ibitsize < BITS_PER_WORD);
>      }
>  
>    return extract_bit_field (cplx, ibitsize, imag_p ? ibitsize : 0,
> diff --git a/gcc/lower-subreg.cc b/gcc/lower-subreg.cc
> index 5dee6a0b646..5033c6886c5 100644
> --- a/gcc/lower-subreg.cc
> +++ b/gcc/lower-subreg.cc
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>  #include "memmodel.h"
>  #include "tm_p.h"
>  #include "expmed.h"
> +#include "regs.h"
>  #include "insn-config.h"
>  #include "emit-rtl.h"
>  #include "recog.h"
> @@ -113,6 +114,9 @@ interesting_mode_p (machine_mode mode, unsigned int 
> *bytes,
>  {
>    if (!GET_MODE_SIZE (mode).is_constant (bytes))
>      return false;
> +  if (maybe_lt ((unsigned) UNITS_PER_WORD,
> +             (poly_uint64) REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE (mode)))
> +    return false;
>    *words = CEIL (*bytes, UNITS_PER_WORD);
>    return true;
>  }
> @@ -302,7 +306,20 @@ static bool
>  simple_move_operand (rtx x)
>  {
>    if (GET_CODE (x) == SUBREG)
> -    x = SUBREG_REG (x);
> +    {
> +      /* Exclude subregs whose outer mode can be split into multiple words
> +      but whose inner mode cannot.  Attempting to split such a subreg
> +      would mean trying to split the unsplittable inner register.
> +
> +      If instead the subreg occupies a single word, we can keep it as-is,
> +      regardless of what the SUBREG_REG is.  If the outer mode cannot be
> +      split then the subreg makes things no worse than they already are.  */
> +      unsigned int factor, size;
> +      if (interesting_mode_p (GET_MODE (x), &size, &factor) && factor > 1
> +       && !interesting_mode_p (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (x)), &size, &factor))
> +     return false;
> +      x = SUBREG_REG (x);
> +    }
>  
>    if (!OBJECT_P (x))
>      return false;
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr125390.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr125390.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..6ea9e509ba8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr125390.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv_zvl256b -mabi=lp64d -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl 
> -O2 --param=riscv-autovec-mode=RVVMF8QI -fno-vect-cost-model" } */
> +
> +int a, b[64], c[64];
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  for (unsigned e = 0; e < 8; e += 2)
> +    {
> +      a = c[e] ^ c[e + 1];
> +      b[e] = 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar (void)
> +{
> +  for (unsigned e = 0; e < 16; e += 2)
> +    {
> +      a = c[e] ^ c[e + 1];
> +      b[e] = 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +baz (void)
> +{
> +  for (unsigned e = 0; e < 32; e += 4)
> +    {
> +      a = c[e] ^ c[e + 1] ^ c[e + 2] ^ c[e + 3];
> +      b[e] = 0;
> +    }
> +}

Reply via email to