Richard Sandiford <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> writes: >>>> How is CONST_WIDE_INT variable size? >>> >>> It's just the usual trailing variable-length array thing. >> >> Good. Do you get rid of CONST_DOUBLE (for integers) at the same time? > > Yeah. I initially thought it might be OK to keep them and have > CONST_INT, integer CONST_DOUBLEs and CONST_WIDE_INT alongside > each other. (The way the patch is structured means that the > choice of whether to keep integer CONST_DOUBLEs can be changed > very easily.) But Kenny convinced me it was a bad idea.
Sorry to follow up on myself, but to clarify: I was talking about converted targets here. (As in, I originally thought even converted targets could continue to use integer CONST_DOUBLEs.) Unconverted targets continue to use CONST_DOUBLE. Richard
