Hello Joseph, Please see my responses below: >-----Original Message----- >From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com] >Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:45 PM >To: Iyer, Balaji V >Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >Subject: Re: [Ping]FW: [PATCH] Cilk Plus merging to trunk (2 of n) > >On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > >> Did you get a chance to look at this submission? I think I have fixed >> all the changes you have mentioned. Is it OK for trunk? > >I expect to look at the revised specification and patch later this month. >My initial impression from a glance at the revised specification was that it >was >much improved, but some issues would probably still require further work on the >specification - and once those had been resolved, then a detailed review of the >patch would make sense.
Sure! I am not sure if you noticed, but Richard Guenther gave me some additional feedback today and I have fixed them and submitted another patch. Here is the thread for that email (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00431.html). I just wanted to let you know about this. Also, I have other parts of Cilk Plus. Can I submit them now itself or should I wait till this is reviewed? Thank you very much for helping me with this! Yours Sincerely, Balaji V. Iyer. > >-- >Joseph S. Myers >jos...@codesourcery.com
