On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 3, 2012, at 4:49 PM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Another suggestion from Segher is "_F.", which is both reserve and >> cannot conflict with C/C++ because identifiers cannot contain ".". > > The problem with that are machines that don't like "." in identifiers (aka > NO_DOT_IN_LABEL)… so one just has to be a little careful in using it.
That's a good reason to use "_F". And NO_DOT_IN_LABEL systems will not function with the current "." mangling. - David
