On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> All INTEGER_CSTs are TREE_CONSTANT, I don't see the point
> in testing that. Ok for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> 2012-09-27 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> * init.c (build_new_1): Don't test TREE_CONSTANT
> of INTEGER_CST.
>
> --- gcc/cp/init.c.jj 2012-09-25 11:59:43.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/init.c 2012-09-27 12:42:32.382457943 +0200
> @@ -2235,8 +2235,7 @@ build_new_1 (VEC(tree,gc) **placement, t
> {
> tree inner_nelts = array_type_nelts_top (elt_type);
> tree inner_nelts_cst = maybe_constant_value (inner_nelts);
> - if (TREE_CONSTANT (inner_nelts_cst)
> - && TREE_CODE (inner_nelts_cst) == INTEGER_CST)
> + if (TREE_CODE (inner_nelts_cst) == INTEGER_CST)
> {
> bool overflow;
> double_int result = TREE_INT_CST (inner_nelts_cst)
>
> Jakub
