Jeff, > So coming back to this... > > As you are no doubt aware, there's been a couple bugfixes to fold-mem-offsets > ACK'd and pushed into the tree which make this no longer apply cleanly. One > of those committed patches just adjusts a comment and AFAICT the comment just > isn't important anymore after the rewrite. The other change was a bugfix to > make sure we distinguish between the mode of the MEM vs the mode of the > address. It appears that this new code handles that correctly. > > So conceptually the easiest way to move forward is to revert the two changes, > apply your patch and generate a fresh diff against the tip of the trunk.
We have a few fixes (e.g., rejecting mismatches vector sizes) for this in-flight that should all be ready for submission over the next week or so. How would you like to handle this? A single series against top-of-trunk? Thanks, Philipp.
