On 3/17/2026 7:49 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Jeff,
sorry about being so relentless, but I posted the patch in July last year and
the GCC 16 release date is approaching fast.
A non-optimized atomic support for 32-bit targets lacking 64-bit atomic
operations is better than nothing from my point of view.
I don't see any way for this to make gcc-16. gcc-16 is in regression
bugfixes only phase and this is neither a correctness fix nor a
regression. Furthermore it targets rv32 which is a non-priority for my
team here at Qualcomm. So it's hard to justify spending time on it
right now. We'll have to dive back in during the gcc-17 effort.
Sorry, but that's the unfortunately reality.
jeff
