This is the first of a few patches to fix pr90036.

I've gone back and forth about whether or not to fix this for gcc-16 or queue for gcc-17.  Ultimately I don't think these opportunities are that common, so I don't expect widespread code generation changes.

I'm going to drop the changes in a small series as the changes stand on their own.  This gives us better bisectability.

--

The first patch allows refinement of existing equivalences in a case where we'd missed it before.  In particular say we have <res> = <expr> in the expression hash table.  We later use <expr> in a way that creates a temporary expression equivalence.  We'll fail to record that temporary expression equivalence because of the pre-existing entry in the hash table.

And just to be clear, the old equivalence will be restored when we leave the domwalk scope of the newer, more precise, hash table entry.

This matters for pr90036 as we initially enter a simple equivalence in the table with the result being an SSA_NAME.  Later we have a conditional that allows us to refine the result to a constant.  And we're going to need that constant result to trigger additional simplifications and equivalence discovery.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64, aarch64, riscv64 and probably a couple others as well.  It's also been tested across the embedded targets in my tester.  Pushing to the trunk.  More to come.

--

commit 55c6baeb86b10912e98f4cf6b0a432d7c896d81e
Author: Jeff Law <[email protected]>
Date:   Sun Feb 22 09:26:38 2026 -0700

    [1/n][PR tree-optimization/90036] All refinement of entries in DOM hash 
table
    
    This is the first of a few patches to fix pr90036.
    
    I've gone back and forth about whether or not to fix this for gcc-16 or 
queue
    for gcc-17.  Ultimately I don't think these opportunities are *that* 
common, so
    I don't expect widespread code generation changes.
    
    I'm going to drop the changes in a small series as the changes stand on 
their
    own.  This gives us better bisectability.
    
    --
    
    The first patch allows refinement of existing equivalences in a case where 
we'd
    missed it before.  In particular say we have <res> = <expr> in the 
expression
    hash table.  We later use <expr> in a way that creates a temporary 
expression
    equivalence.  We'll fail to record that temporary expression equivalence
    because of the pre-existing entry in the hash table.
    
    And just to be clear, the old equivalence will be restored when we leave the
    domwalk scope of the newer, more precise, hash table entry.
    
    This matters for pr90036 as we initially enter a simple equivalence in the
    table with the result being an SSA_NAME.  Later we have a conditional that
    allows us to refine the result to a constant.  And we're going to need that
    constant result to trigger additional simplifications and equivalence
    discovery.
    
    Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64, aarch64, riscv64 and probably 
a
    couple others as well.  It's also been tested across the embedded targets 
in my
    tester.  Pushing to the trunk.
    
            PR tree-optimization/90036
    gcc/
            * tree-ssa-scopedtables.cc (avail_exprs_stack::record_cond): Always
            record the new hash table entry.

diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.cc
index 828f214c7cb..95523b23478 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-scopedtables.cc
@@ -392,13 +392,13 @@ avail_exprs_stack::record_cond (cond_equivalence *p)
   expr_hash_elt **slot;
 
   slot = m_avail_exprs->find_slot_with_hash (element, element->hash (), 
INSERT);
-  if (*slot == NULL)
-    {
-      *slot = element;
-      record_expr (element, NULL, '1');
-    }
-  else
-    delete element;
+
+  /* We will always get back a valid slot in the hash table.  Go ahead and
+     record the new equivalence.  While it may be overwriting something older,
+     the belief is that the newer equivalence is more likely to be useful as
+     it was derived using more information/context.  */
+  record_expr (element, *slot, '1');
+  *slot = element;
 }
 
 /* Generate a hash value for a pair of expressions.  This can be used

Reply via email to