On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 03:48:42PM +0900, Jason Merrill wrote: > On 2/19/26 11:08 PM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 02:53:29PM +0900, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > On 2/18/26 8:33 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > > A function template is supposed to be wrapped in an OVERLOAD. > > > > > > I don't object to this change, but I've noticed that expectation in the > > > reflection code (e.g. using really_overloaded_ to test for a template), > > > and > > > wondered why it's necessary? It would seem simpler to do without it. > > > > I think since the rest of the front end works with that assumption, > > the Reflection code should work that way too. Otherwise we crash like > > here when splicing. > > Yeah, I just wonder how much trouble it would be to change that assumption > elsewhere.
Should I go ahead with the patch then? Marek
