On Fri, 5 Dec 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:

> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 4:26 PM Patrick Palka <[email protected]> wrote:
>       On Fri, 5 Dec 2025, Tomasz Kaminski wrote:
> 
>       > Just one small suggestion, otherwise LGTM.
>       >
>       > On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 3:57 PM Patrick Palka <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>       >       Tested on x86_64-pc-linu-xgnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>       >
>       >       -- >8 --
>       >
>       >       Implement the cv-qual forwarding required by std::bind using 
> deducing
>       >       this when available, instead of needing 4 operator() overloads. 
>  Using
>       >       deducing this here is more complicated here than in other call
>       >       wrappers because std::bind is not really "perfect forwarding": 
> it
>       >       doesn't forward value category, and along with const-ness it 
> also
>       >       forwards volatile-ness (before C++20).
>       >
>       >       The old implementation suffers from the same problem that other
>       >       SFINAE-friendly call wrappers have which is solved by using 
> deducing
>       >       this (see p5.5 of the deducing this paper P0847R7).
>       >
>       >               PR libstdc++/80564
>       >
>       >       libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>       >
>       >               * include/std/functional (__cv_like): New.
>       >               (_Bind::_Res_type): Don't define when not needed.
>       >               (_Bind::__dependent): Likewise.
>       >               (_Bind::_Res_type_cv): Likewise.
>       >               (_Bind::operator()) [_GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER]:
>       >               Define as two instead of four overloads using deducing
>       >               this.
>       >               * testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc: Ignore SFINAE
>       >               diagnostics inside headers.
>       >               * testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc: Likewise.
>       >               * testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc: New test.
>       >       ---
>       >        libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional           | 81 
> +++++++++++++++++++
>       >        .../testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc      |  3 +
>       >        .../testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc      | 39 +++++++++
>       >        .../testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc         |  1 +
>       >        4 files changed, 124 insertions(+)
>       >        create mode 100644 
> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc
>       >
>       >       diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional 
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
>       >       index 1928a27d3fd6..9348356f03ce 100644
>       >       --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
>       >       +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
>       >       @@ -495,6 +495,28 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>       >        # define _GLIBCXX_DEPR_BIND
>       >        #endif
>       >
>       >       +#if _GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER
>       >       +  // Return a _Up that has the same cv-quals as _Tp.
>       >       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       >       +    struct __cv_like
>       >       +    { using type = _Up; };
>       >       +
>       >       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       >       +    struct __cv_like<const _Tp, _Up>
>       >       +    { using type = const _Up; };
>       >       +
>       >       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       >       +    struct __cv_like<volatile _Tp, _Up>
>       >       +    { using type = volatile _Up; };
>       >       +
>       >       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       >       +    struct __cv_like<const volatile _Tp, _Up>
>       >       +    { using type = const volatile _Up; };
>       >       +
>       >       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       >       +    using __cv_like_t = typename __cv_like<_Tp, _Up>::type;
>       >       +#endif
>       >       +
>       >          /// Type of the function object returned from bind().
>       >          template<typename _Signature>
>       >            class _Bind;
>       >       @@ -564,6 +586,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>       >               using _Res_type_impl
>       >                 = __invoke_result_t<_Fn&, _Mu_type<_BArgs, 
> _CallArgs>&&...>;
>       >
>       >       +#if !_GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER
>       >              template<typename _CallArgs>
>       >               using _Res_type = _Res_type_impl<_Functor, _CallArgs, 
> _Bound_args...>;
>       >
>       >       @@ -576,6 +599,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>       >                 typename __cv_quals<__dependent<_CallArgs>>::type,
>       >                 _CallArgs,
>       >                 typename __cv_quals<_Bound_args>::type...>;
>       >       +#endif
>       >
>       >             public:
>       >              template<typename... _Args>
>       >       @@ -593,6 +617,62 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>       >              _Bind(const _Bind&) = default;
>       >              _Bind(_Bind&&) = default;
>       >
>       >       +#if _GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER
>       >       +# pragma GCC diagnostic push
>       >       +# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wc++17-extensions" // if 
> constexpr
>       >       +# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wc++23-extensions" // 
> deducing this
>       >       +      // Call unqualified
>       >       +      template<typename... _Args,
>       >       +              typename _Self,
>       >       +              typename _Self_nonref = typename 
> remove_reference<_Self>::type,
>       >       +              __enable_if_t<!is_volatile<_Self_nonref>::value, 
> int> = 0,
>       >       +              typename _Result
>       >       +                = _Res_type_impl<__cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, 
> _Functor>,
>       >       +                                 tuple<_Args...>,
>       >       +                                 __cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, 
> _Bound_args>...>>
>       >       +       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
>       >       +       _Result
>       >       +       operator()(this _Self&& __self, _Args&&... __args)
>       >       +       {
>       >       +         if constexpr (is_const<_Self_nonref>::value)
>       >       +           return static_cast<const _Bind&>(__self)
>       >
>       > Once you have __cv_like_t, is there any reason to not use something 
> like here:
>       >       using _Bind_ref_t = __cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, _Bind>&;
>       >         _Bind_ref_t(__self).
>       > I think we also need to use c-cast, if someone privately inherited 
> from bind specialization,
>       > for some reason. I thinking of version of overload:
>       > template<typename... Funcs>
>       > class Overload : Funcs....
>       > {
>       > public: 
>       >      Overload(Funcs... func) : Funcs(funcs)... {}
>       >      using Funcs::operator()....;
>       > };
>       >
>       > And then used with bind.
> 
>       Good catch, I keep forgetting we need a C-style cast with deducing
>       this.
> 
>       Changes in v2:
>       - use a C-style cast instead of static_cast when casting explicit
>         this parameter to the curret instantiation, and add test for that
> 
>       Testing on x86_64-pc-ilnux-gnu in progress, OK for trunk once
>       passes?
> 
> LGTM. 

Thanks!

> 
>       -- >8 --
> 
>       Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Use deducing this in std::bind when 
> available
>        [PR80564]
> 
>       Implement the cv-qual forwarding required by std::bind using deducing
>       this when available, instead of needing 4 operator() overloads.  Using
>       deducing this here is more complicated here than in other call
>       wrappers because std::bind is not really "perfect forwarding": it
>       doesn't forward value category, and along with const-ness it also
>       forwards volatile-ness (before C++20).
> 
>       The old implementation suffers from the same problem that other
>       SFINAE-friendly call wrappers have which is solved by using deducing
>       this (see p5.5 of the deducing this paper P0847R7).
> 
>               PR libstdc++/80564
> 
>       libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> 
>               * include/std/functional (__cv_like): New.
>               (_Bind::_Res_type): Don't define when not needed.
>               (_Bind::__dependent): Likewise.
>               (_Bind::_Res_type_cv): Likewise.
>               (_Bind::operator()) [_GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER]:
>               Define as two instead of four overloads using deducing
>               this.
>               * testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc: Ignore SFINAE
>               diagnostics inside headers.
>               * testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc: Likewise.
>               * testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc: New test.
>       ---
>        libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional           | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
>        .../testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc      |  3 +
>        .../testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc      | 50 +++++++++++
>        .../testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc         |  1 +
>        4 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
>        create mode 100644 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc
> 
>       diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional 
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
>       index 1928a27d3fd6..06ff32752d4a 100644
>       --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
>       +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional
>       @@ -495,6 +495,28 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>        # define _GLIBCXX_DEPR_BIND
>        #endif
> 
>       +#if _GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER
>       +  // Return a _Up that has the same cv-quals as _Tp.
>       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up> // _Up should be cv-unqualified
>       +    struct __cv_like
>       +    { using type = _Up; };
>       +
>       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       +    struct __cv_like<const _Tp, _Up>
>       +    { using type = const _Up; };
>       +
>       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       +    struct __cv_like<volatile _Tp, _Up>
>       +    { using type = volatile _Up; };
>       +
>       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       +    struct __cv_like<const volatile _Tp, _Up>
>       +    { using type = const volatile _Up; };
>       +
>       +  template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>       +    using __cv_like_t = typename __cv_like<_Tp, _Up>::type;
>       +#endif
>       +
>          /// Type of the function object returned from bind().
>          template<typename _Signature>
>            class _Bind;
>       @@ -564,6 +586,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>               using _Res_type_impl
>                 = __invoke_result_t<_Fn&, _Mu_type<_BArgs, _CallArgs>&&...>;
> 
>       +#if !_GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER
>              template<typename _CallArgs>
>               using _Res_type = _Res_type_impl<_Functor, _CallArgs, 
> _Bound_args...>;
> 
>       @@ -576,6 +599,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>                 typename __cv_quals<__dependent<_CallArgs>>::type,
>                 _CallArgs,
>                 typename __cv_quals<_Bound_args>::type...>;
>       +#endif
> 
>             public:
>              template<typename... _Args>
>       @@ -593,6 +617,63 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>              _Bind(const _Bind&) = default;
>              _Bind(_Bind&&) = default;
> 
>       +#if _GLIBCXX_EXPLICIT_THIS_PARAMETER
>       +# pragma GCC diagnostic push
>       +# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wc++17-extensions" // if constexpr
>       +# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wc++23-extensions" // deducing this
>       +      template<typename... _Args,
>       +              typename _Self,
>       +              typename _Self_nonref = typename 
> remove_reference<_Self>::type,
>       +              __enable_if_t<!is_volatile<_Self_nonref>::value, int> = 
> 0,
>       +              typename _Result
>       +                = _Res_type_impl<__cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, _Functor>,
>       +                                 tuple<_Args...>,
>       +                                 __cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, 
> _Bound_args>...>>
>       +       _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
>       +       _Result
>       +       operator()(this _Self&& __self, _Args&&... __args)
>       +       {
>       +         using _Bind_ref = __cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, _Bind>&;
>       +         if constexpr (is_const<_Self_nonref>::value)
>       +           return _Bind_ref(__self)
>       +             .template __call_c<_Result>(std::forward_as_tuple
>       +                                         
> (std::forward<_Args>(__args)...),
>       +                                         _Bound_indexes());
>       +         else
>       +           return _Bind_ref(__self)
>       +             .template __call<_Result>(std::forward_as_tuple
>       +                                       
> (std::forward<_Args>(__args)...),
>       +                                       _Bound_indexes());
>       +       }
>       +
>       +# if defined(_GLIBCXX_VOLATILE_BIND)
>       +      template<typename... _Args,
>       +              typename _Self,
>       +              typename _Self_nonref = typename 
> remove_reference<_Self>::type,
>       +              __enable_if_t<is_volatile<_Self_nonref>::value, int> = 0,
>       +              typename _Result
>       +                = _Res_type_impl<__cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, _Functor>,
>       +                                 tuple<_Args...>,
>       +                                 __cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, 
> _Bound_args>...>>

By the way the reason we need this separate overload for the volatile
case is solely to emit a deprecation diagnostic in C++17 mode, otherwise
we could get away with just one overload in all modes. (In C++20
the volatile overloads got removed.) So in theory we could have just one
overload before C++17, since we don't need a deprecation message in that
case, but that'd result in more complexity and code duplication as the
main overload would need to forward to __call_c_v and __call_v as well
and doesn't seem worth it.

>       +       _GLIBCXX_DEPR_BIND
>       +       _Result
>       +       operator()(this _Self&& __self, _Args&&... __args)
>       +       {
>       +         using _Bind_ref = __cv_like_t<_Self_nonref, _Bind>&;
>       +         if constexpr (is_const<_Self_nonref>::value)
>       +           return _Bind_ref(__self)
>       +             .template __call_c_v<_Result>(std::forward_as_tuple
>       +                                           
> (std::forward<_Args>(__args)...),
>       +                                           _Bound_indexes());
>       +         else
>       +           return _Bind_ref(__self)
>       +             .template __call_v<_Result>(std::forward_as_tuple
>       +                                         
> (std::forward<_Args>(__args)...),
>       +                                         _Bound_indexes());
>       +       }
>       +# endif
>       +# pragma GCC diagnostic pop
>       +#else
>              // Call unqualified
>              template<typename... _Args,
>                      typename _Result = _Res_type<tuple<_Args...>>>
>       @@ -642,6 +723,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>                     _Bound_indexes());
>               }
>        #endif // volatile
>       +#endif
>            };
> 
>          /// Type of the function object returned from bind<R>().
>       diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc
>       index e4c348f7a3ca..6d37cc43fd3a 100644
>       --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc
>       +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_2.cc
>       @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ void test01()
>                              // { dg-error "no match" "" { target c++20 } 43 }
>        }
> 
>       +// Ignore the reasons for deduction/substitution failure in the 
> headers.
>       +// { dg-prune-output "no type named 'type' in 'struct 
> std::enable_if<false" }
>       +
>        int main()
>        {
>          test01();
>       diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc
>       new file mode 100644
>       index 000000000000..f6e1a1ec66da
>       --- /dev/null
>       +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/cv_quals_4.cc
>       @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>       +// PR libstdc++/80564 - bind on SFINAE unfriendly generic lambda
>       +// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
>       +
>       +#include <functional>
>       +
>       +struct A
>       +{
>       +  template<typename T>
>       +  auto operator()(T&)
>       +  { }
>       +
>       +  template<typename T>
>       +  auto operator()(T&) const
>       +  { T::fail; }
>       +};
>       +
>       +void
>       +test01()
>       +{
>       +  A a;
>       +  std::bind(a, 0)(); // doesn't consider the const overload
>       +  std::bind<void>(a, 0)();
>       +}
>       +
>       +void
>       +test02()
>       +{
>       +  auto f = [] (auto& x) { x = 1; };
>       +  int i;
>       +  std::bind(f, i)(); // doesn't try const-invoking the lambda
>       +  std::bind<void>(f, i)();
>       +}
>       +
>       +#if __cpp_variadic_using
>       +template<typename... Ts>
>       +struct overloaded : private Ts...
>       +{
>       +  overloaded(Ts... ts) : Ts(ts)... { }
>       +  using Ts::operator()...;
>       +};
>       +
>       +void
>       +test03()
>       +{
>       +  A a;
>       +  auto f = std::bind(a, 0);
>       +  overloaded<decltype(f)> g(f);
>       +  g();
>       +}
>       +#endif
>       diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc 
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc
>       index dd47c437d426..46cc4bb330e2 100644
>       --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc
>       +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/bind/ref_neg.cc
>       @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ void test02()
>        // Ignore the reasons for deduction/substitution failure in the 
> headers.
>        // Arrange for the match to work on installed trees as well as build 
> trees.
>        // { dg-prune-output "no type named 'type' in 'struct 
> std::__invoke_result" }
>       +// { dg-prune-output "no type named 'type' in 'struct 
> std::enable_if<false" }
> 
>        int main()
>        {
>       --
>       2.52.0.154.gf0ef5b6d9b
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to