Currently, build_over_call calls build_cplus_new in template decls, generating
a TARGET_EXPR that it then passes to fold_non_dependent_expr, which ends up
calling tsubst_expr, and since tsubst_expr doesn't handle TARGET_EXPRs, it ICEs.
Since there is no way for this code path to be executed without causing an
ICE, I believe it can be removed.
---
gcc/cp/call.cc | 13 +++----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
index f80d597b3394..7985c2d5e1bb 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
@@ -10328,18 +10328,11 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *cand, int flags,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
TREE_NO_WARNING (expr) = true;
if (immediate_invocation_p (fn))
{
- tree obj_arg = NULL_TREE, exprimm = expr;
+ tree obj_arg = NULL_TREE;
if (DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (fn))
obj_arg = first_arg;
- if (obj_arg
- && is_dummy_object (obj_arg)
- && !type_dependent_expression_p (obj_arg))
- {
- exprimm = build_cplus_new (DECL_CONTEXT (fn), expr, complain);
- obj_arg = NULL_TREE;
- }
/* Look through *(const T *)&obj. */
- else if (obj_arg && INDIRECT_REF_P (obj_arg))
+ if (obj_arg && INDIRECT_REF_P (obj_arg))
{
tree addr = TREE_OPERAND (obj_arg, 0);
STRIP_NOPS (addr);
@@ -10351,7 +10344,7 @@ build_over_call (struct z_candidate *cand, int flags,
tsubst_flags_t complain)
obj_arg = TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0);
}
}
- fold_non_dependent_expr (exprimm, complain,
+ fold_non_dependent_expr (expr, complain,
/*manifestly_const_eval=*/true,
obj_arg);
}
--
2.47.3
