> So the target_attr-06 failures are not related to this patch, so we can > set those aside. > > And yes, I'd agree this is just a bug and we should fix it and probably > document it in the release notes for gcc-16 (which don't exist yet).
Yeah, I agree that should be documented in the release note, and I guess we might start to collect that. > OK for the trunk. I'd lean slightly against adjusting gcc-15 but if you > felt strongly we should adjust gcc-15 I could be convinced that a > backport is warranted (in which case I'd very much like to see a bug > raised so that it gets onto the list of issues we'll touch on in the > release notes for gcc-15 as well). I don't intend to backport to GCC-15 since it's kinda ABI breakage, so let's keep it for GCC 16+ only. > > Somewhat related, do we have plans (or have we already handled) _BitInt? > That's PR 117581. That's on my top of TODO list, I definitely don't want to miss that on GCC 16, so I will send patch soon :P > > jeff > > >
