On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Igor Zamyatin <izamya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like this patch (original version at the bottom) also to be
>> backported into 4.7.
>>
>> Is it safe to backport?
>
> Looks safe to me.
>
> OK if there are no objections from RMs in the next 24h.
All testing passed so following will be checked in 4.7.
Index: gcc/config/i386/i386.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/i386/i386.c (revision 190833)
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c (working copy)
@@ -23842,6 +23842,7 @@
case PROCESSOR_CORE2_64:
case PROCESSOR_COREI7_32:
case PROCESSOR_COREI7_64:
+ case PROCESSOR_ATOM:
/* Generally, we want haifa-sched:max_issue() to look ahead as far
as many instructions can be executed on a cycle, i.e.,
issue_rate. I wonder why tuning for many CPUs does not do this. */
Original Changelog:
2012-08-23 Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrum...@gmail.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead) : Add
case for Atom processor.
Thanks,
Igor
>
> Thanks,
> Uros.
