On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 12:03 AM Tobias Burnus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Yuao, hi all,
>
> Yuao Ma wrote:
> > I think this patch explains itself. This is identified during working
> > on r16-4695-gb6146faae09bbc and should be safe to remove after
> > r16-4474-g2c1949bf152f8f landed.
> >
> > Regression tested on x86_64-linux. Ok for trunk?
>
> LGTM.
>
> As you mentioned, r16-4474-g2c1949bf152f8f added the required support –
> such that the comment is outdated and the code no longer needed.
>

Thanks for the prompt review! Pushed as r16-4712-gd0ff10a005eed4.

Yuao

Reply via email to