On 08/23/2012 03:51 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
WRT only the code expansion aspects in store_fixed_bit_field(), would a test of "STRICT_ALIGNMENT&& MEM_ALIGN(op0)< GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT(mode)" be sufficient to detect instead of a packedp parameter?
As an experiment, I tried putting in an assertion to compare this test to the packedp flag at the point in extract_fixed_bit_field where packedp is currently being checked, and testing showed the two expressions are not equivalent (e.g., on gcc.c-torture/execute/20010518-2.c).
-Sandra
