On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Sandra Loosemore
> <san...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> On 08/21/2012 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Would be nice to add a compile test for -mabi=64 just to make sure
>>> that Pmode == DImode works.  A copy of an existing test like
>>> code-readable-1.c would be fine.
>>
>>
>> I'm having problems with this part -- it seems like every combination of
>> options with -mabi=64 I've tried with code-readable-1.c complains about
>> something-or-another being incompatible.  The closest I've come is "-mabi=64
>> -march=mips64 -msoft-float", which is accepted by the mipsisa32r2-sde-elf
>
> Did you test this at all on a mips64-*-* target?  After this change
> n64 jump tables are broken.
> Before CASE_VECTOR_MODE was DImode for n64 .
>
> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54371 for why it fails.
> gpdword produces a double word for n64.
>
> For EABI64 it is ok to load 32bits because that the addresses are
> 32bits but for n64, it is not ok.  The load addresses are normally
> above the 32bits boundary.

I am testing a patch which changes CASE_VECTOR_MODE to be:
#define CASE_VECTOR_MODE ((mips_abi == ABI_64) ? DImode : SImode)

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Reply via email to