On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 4:34 AM Andrew Pinski
<andrew.pin...@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> Inside split_address_to_core_and_offset, this calls get_inner_reference.
>
> Take:
> ```
>   _6 = t_3(D) + 12;
>   _8 = &MEM[(struct s1 *)t_3(D) + 4B].t;
>   _1 = _6 - _8;
> ```
>
> On the assignement of _8, get_inner_reference will return `MEM[(struct s1 
> *)t_3(D) + 4B]`
> and an offset but that does not match up with `t_3(D)` which is how 
> split_address_to_core_and_offset
> handles pointer plus.
> So this patch adds the unwrapping of the MEM_REF after the call to 
> get_inner_reference
> and have it act like a pointer plus.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * v2: Remove check on operand 1 for poly_int_tree_p, it is always.
>       Add before the check to see if it fits in shwi instead of after.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

>         PR tree-optimization/121355
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * fold-const.cc (split_address_to_core_and_offset): Handle an MEM_REF 
> after the call
>         to get_inner_reference.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ptrdiff-1.c: New test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pin...@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  gcc/fold-const.cc                         | 11 ++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ptrdiff-1.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ptrdiff-1.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fold-const.cc b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> index 8867540243b..fe7a5fee5e2 100644
> --- a/gcc/fold-const.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fold-const.cc
> @@ -16514,6 +16514,17 @@ split_address_to_core_and_offset (tree exp,
>        core = get_inner_reference (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0), &bitsize, pbitpos,
>                                   poffset, &mode, &unsignedp, &reversep,
>                                   &volatilep);
> +      /* If we are left with MEM[a + CST] strip that and add it to the
> +        pbitpos and return a. */
> +      if (TREE_CODE (core) == MEM_REF)
> +       {
> +         poly_offset_int tem;
> +         tem = wi::to_poly_offset (TREE_OPERAND (core, 1));
> +         tem <<= LOG2_BITS_PER_UNIT;
> +         tem += *pbitpos;
> +         if (tem.to_shwi (pbitpos))
> +           return TREE_OPERAND (core, 0);
> +       }
>        core = build_fold_addr_expr_loc (loc, core);
>      }
>    else if (TREE_CODE (exp) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ptrdiff-1.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ptrdiff-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..af9291c6608
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ptrdiff-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
> +
> +/* PR tree-optimization/121355 */
> +
> +#define array_size 2
> +struct s1
> +{
> +  int t[array_size];
> +};
> +
> +struct s2
> +{
> +  int p;
> +  struct s1 t;
> +};
> +static inline int *b(struct s1 *t)
> +{
> +  return t->t;
> +}
> +static inline int *e(struct s1 *t)
> +{
> +  return b(t) + array_size;
> +}
> +void g(struct s2 *t)
> +{
> +  struct s1 *t2 = &t->t;
> +  int *te = e(t2);
> +  int *ts = b(t2);
> +  int tt = te - ts;
> +/*
> +  _6 = t_3(D) + 12;
> +  _8 = &MEM[(struct s1 *)t_3(D) + 4B].t;
> +  _1 = _6 - _8;
> +
> +  _1 should be optimized to 2*sizeof(int) == 8.
> + */
> +
> +  if (tt != array_size)
> +    __builtin_abort();
> +}
> +
> +/* the call to abort should be removed. */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "abort " "optimized" } } */
> --
> 2.43.0
>

Reply via email to