On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 08:24:18PM -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 8/25/25 00:13, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Yes, GCC doesn't have it implemented fully, but that doesn't mean it should
> > be ripped off, the implementation should be simply finished.
>
> Well, I have no idea how to make this work, nor any enthusiasm for devoting
> a big block of time to this. So I've taken Tobias's suggestion of emitting
> a "sorry" for the incomplete functionality instead of silently emitting bad
> code. New part 2 patch attached. Is this OK?
I wouldn't emit sorry for targets where we already implement it "correctly",
i.e. at least all targets which have NULL
targetm.simd_clone.compute_vecsize_and_simdlen
There the argument transformation is identity.
Jakub
