This patch is for the google/gcc-4_7 branch.

When a location list or location expression is removed from a DIE, we
need to remove entries in the .debug_addr table that were referenced
by those location expressions.  Except for one case, the existing code
checked only the first descriptor in each location expression instead
of looping through all the descriptors.  In cases where we don't
remove the .debug_addr table entries, an ICE occurs during assembly
output.

This patch also fixes an ICE in output_pubname with -ggnu-pubnames,
where we are asserting on TAGs that GDB doesn't care about.  Instead
of asserting, we should just be setting the flags to 0.


2012-08-20   Cary Coutant  <ccout...@google.com>

gcc/
        * dwarf2out.c (remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries): Change
        parameter; update all calls.
        (output_pubname): Don't assert on unknown TAGs.
        (resolve_addr): Call remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries for all
        location expressions.


Index: gcc/dwarf2out.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/dwarf2out.c     (revision 190548)
+++ gcc/dwarf2out.c     (working copy)
@@ -4858,13 +4858,9 @@ remove_addr_table_entry (unsigned int i)
    address_table.  */
 
 static void
-remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries (dw_loc_list_ref loc)
+remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries (dw_loc_descr_ref descr)
 {
-  dw_loc_descr_ref descr;
-
-  gcc_assert (loc->replaced);
-
-  for (descr = loc->expr; descr; descr = descr->dw_loc_next)
+  for (; descr; descr = descr->dw_loc_next)
     if (descr->dw_loc_oprnd1.val_index != -1U)
       remove_addr_table_entry (descr->dw_loc_oprnd1.val_index);
 }
@@ -9468,7 +9464,8 @@ output_pubname (dw_offset die_offset, pu
           GDB_INDEX_SYMBOL_STATIC_SET_VALUE(flags, 1);
           break;
         default:
-          gcc_unreachable ();
+         /* For unrecognized TAGs, don't set the flags.  */
+          break;
       }
       dw2_asm_output_data (1, flags >> GDB_INDEX_CU_BITSIZE,
                            "GDB-index flags");
@@ -22875,8 +22872,8 @@ resolve_addr (dw_die_ref die)
                        gcc_assert (!next->ll_symbol);
                        next->ll_symbol = (*curr)->ll_symbol;
                      }
-                   if (l->dw_loc_oprnd1.val_index != -1U)
-                     remove_addr_table_entry (l->dw_loc_oprnd1.val_index);
+                   if (dwarf_split_debug_info)
+                     remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries (l);
                    *curr = next;
                  }
                else
@@ -22891,7 +22888,7 @@ resolve_addr (dw_die_ref die)
              {
                loc->replaced = 1;
                 if (dwarf_split_debug_info)
-                  remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries (loc);
+                  remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries (loc->expr);
                loc->dw_loc_next = *start;
              }
          }
@@ -22916,8 +22913,8 @@ resolve_addr (dw_die_ref die)
               || l->dw_loc_next != NULL)
              && !resolve_addr_in_expr (l))
            {
-             if (l->dw_loc_oprnd1.val_index != -1U)
-               remove_addr_table_entry (l->dw_loc_oprnd1.val_index);
+             if (dwarf_split_debug_info)
+               remove_loc_list_addr_table_entries (l);
              remove_AT (die, a->dw_attr);
              ix--;
            }

Reply via email to