Thanks Robin. > I assume the test expectation changes are necessary because the subrtx check > captures all operations and with the default settings (scalar-vec-cost = 0) > we > always prefer vv over vx/vf?
Yes, of course. The previous vx/vf combine patch(s) needs to do similar change too. Let's wait for the CI and see. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Robin Dapp <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 10:35 PM To: Li, Pan2 <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Chen, Ken <[email protected]>; Liu, Hongtao <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Refactor the vec_duplicate cost on gpr/fpr2vr-cost param Looks much more reasonable, thanks. I assume the test expectation changes are necessary because the subrtx check captures all operations and with the default settings (scalar-vec-cost = 0) we always prefer vv over vx/vf? -- Regards Robin
