On 8/3/25 8:19 PM, Li, Pan2 wrote:
Thanks for trying, it really is appreciated. And just to be clear the patch is OK, even without an execute test.Thanks Jeff.OK. Any change we could get run test for this in addition to the scanners?I tried to add run test target this but seems happen to work here for mulhsu. Here we only cares the result(high bits of mul) has values or not, looks like mulhsu will not result in correctness problem.
jeff
