Now reworded and committed - see attached + https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-16/changes.html

Thanks for the comments!

Tobias
commit b420d69be557f55635d869b770e80789977ffcf4
Author: Tobias Burnus <tbur...@baylibre.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 30 09:41:30 2025 +0200

    gcc-16/changes.html: Update OpenACC support

diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html
index cc6fe204..19304ce1 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-16/changes.html
@@ -67,6 +67,19 @@ for general information.</p>
       href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libgomp/acc_005fmemcpy_005fdevice.html";>
       <code>acc_memcpy_device</code> and <code>acc_memcpy_device_async</code></a>
       API routines have been added for C, C++ and Fortran.</li>
+  <li>OpenACC 3.0: The <code>wait</code> directive now accepts the
+      <code>if</code> clause.</li>
+  <li>OpenACC 3.3: The Fortran API routines <code><a
+      href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libgomp/acc_005fattach.html";>
+      acc_attach</a></code> and <code><a
+      href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libgomp/acc_005fdetach.html";>
+      acc_detach</a></code> now augment their OpenACC 2.6 C/C++ counterparts.
+      </li>
+  <li>OpenACC 3.4: In Fortran, named constants (<code>PARAMETER</code>) used as
+      <em>var</em> in data clauses are now permitted by the specification and
+      GCC for better compatibility with existing code; however, with GCC,
+      specifying them in data clauses affects neither compile-time nor runtime
+      behavior.</li>
 </ul>
 
 <!-- <h3 id="ada">Ada</h3> -->

Reply via email to