FYI, here is our proposal to WG (the C standard committee) to generally solve the problem of forward referencing and name lookup for fields for this new category attributes which need to refer to “peers", including bounds attributes: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3656.pdf
Cheers, Yeoul > On Jul 26, 2025, at 9:41 AM, Yeoul Na <yeoul...@apple.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 23, 2025, at 2:11 PM, Joseph Myers <josmy...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 23 Jul 2025, Martin Uecker wrote: >> >>> IMHO there are enough reasons to reject delayed parsing >>> as bad design for C. We should work towards proper >>> language features that cleanly fit into the language, >>> instead of pushing the boundaries with macros. >> >> At the last WG14 meeting it was said there would be a presentation of >> Apple's approach to bounds safety attributes at the next (Brno) meeting. >> Is that still planned (the pre-meeting mailing is this Friday)? > > Yes, and sorry for the delay—we submitted the proposal to WG14 on Thursday. > Hope it will be registered and visible soon! > > Yeoul > >> >> -- >> Joseph S. Myers >> josmy...@redhat.com >> >
