From: Mikael Morin <mik...@gcc.gnu.org> Regression-tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for master?
-- >8 -- Don't look for a class container too far after an array descriptor. This avoids generating a polymorphic array reference, using the virtual table of a parent object, to access a non-polymorphic child having a type unrelated to that of the parent. PR fortran/121185 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * trans-expr.cc (gfc_get_class_from_expr): Give up class descriptor lookup on the second COMPONENT_REF after an array descriptor. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/assign_13.f90: New test. --- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assign_13.f90 | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assign_13.f90 diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc index 7c7621571ad..6cb2b677937 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc @@ -714,6 +714,8 @@ gfc_get_class_from_expr (tree expr) { tree tmp; tree type; + bool array_descr_found = false; + bool comp_after_descr_found = false; for (tmp = expr; tmp; tmp = TREE_OPERAND (tmp, 0)) { @@ -725,6 +727,8 @@ gfc_get_class_from_expr (tree expr) { if (GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P (type)) return tmp; + if (GFC_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_P (type)) + array_descr_found = true; if (type != TYPE_CANONICAL (type)) type = TYPE_CANONICAL (type); else @@ -732,6 +736,23 @@ gfc_get_class_from_expr (tree expr) } if (VAR_P (tmp) || TREE_CODE (tmp) == PARM_DECL) break; + + /* Avoid walking up the reference chain too far. For class arrays, the + array descriptor is a direct component (through a pointer) of the class + container. So there is exactly one COMPONENT_REF between a class + container and its child array descriptor. After seeing an array + descriptor, we can give up on the second COMPONENT_REF we see, if no + class container was found until that point. */ + if (array_descr_found) + { + if (comp_after_descr_found) + { + if (TREE_CODE (tmp) == COMPONENT_REF) + return NULL_TREE; + } + else if (TREE_CODE (tmp) == COMPONENT_REF) + comp_after_descr_found = true; + } } if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (tmp))) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assign_13.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assign_13.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..262ade0997a --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assign_13.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +! { dg-do run } +! +! PR fortran/121185 +! The assignment to Y%X in CHECK_T was using a polymorphic array access on the +! left hand side, using the virtual table of Y. + +program p + implicit none + type t + complex, allocatable :: x(:) + end type t + real :: trace = 2. + type(t) :: z + z%x = [1,2] * trace + call check_t (z) +contains + subroutine check_t (y) + class(t) :: y + ! print *, y% x + if (any(y%x /= [2., 4.])) error stop 11 + y%x = y%x / trace + ! print *, y% x + if (any(y%x /= [1., 2.])) error stop 12 + end subroutine +end -- 2.47.2