On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> which means only 19516 reallocations and 350kb wasted memory. The > compile-time effects are neutral (name-lookup is 1.0+-0.05s on > the reduced testcase) - a slightly different version which omitted > the temporary vector but walked things twice was consistently slower > (about 1.2s). Funny; I found something similar 10 years ago :-/ > It seems we can end up with duplicates in the > names chain of store_bindings (not sure if that is intended). > the chain is supposed to implement a stack, not a set. -- Gaby
