On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 6:06 AM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 08:21:50AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > Given the above that seems rather unlikely, but I suppose it's fine if you
> > want to do it that way. The patch is OK either way.
>
> Committed just the v2 patch. I can test your patch next with other patches,
> or do you want to test/commit it yourself?
Just an FYI, this broke aarch64 build since libgcc has -Werror on
there and we get warnings now in libbid code:
```
../../../gcc/libgcc/config/libbid/bid_binarydecimal.c: In function
‘__binary32_to_bid128’:
../../../gcc/libgcc/config/libbid/bid_binarydecimal.c:130:31: error:
variable ‘c3’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable=]
130 | { unsigned long long c0,c1,c2,c3; \
| ^~
../../../gcc/libgcc/config/libbid/bid_binarydecimal.c:146842:5: note:
in expansion of macro ‘__mul_10x256_to_256’
146842 | __mul_10x256_to_256 (z.w[5], z.w[4], z.w[3], z.w[2],
z.w[5], z.w[4],
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/311/builds/1483
I will see if there is anything simple to be done in the next few hours.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Jakub
>
