On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 19:56:52 +0100 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramra...@arm.com> wrote:
> On 07/24/12 13:27, Julian Brown wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:15:27 +0100 > > Julian Brown <jul...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > > >> Anyway: this revised version of the patch removes the strange > >> libgcc Makefile-fragment changes, the equivalent of which have > >> since been incorporated into mainline GCC now anyway, so the patch > >> is somewhat more straightforward than it was previously. > > > > Joey Ye contacted me offlist and suggested that the t-divmod-ef > > fragment might be better integrated into t-bpabi instead. Doing that > > makes the patch somewhat smaller/cleaner. > > > > Minimally re-tested, looks OK. > > The original submission makes no mention of testing ? The ARM > specific portions look OK to me modulo no regressions. Thanks -- I'm sure I did test the patch, but just omitted to mention that fact in the mail :-O. We've also been carrying a version of this patch in our local source base for many years now. > Ian, can also take a quick look. Cheers, Julian
