> It looks like there's ~200 uses of risc_v in dg-do run clauses in the > "sat" subdirectory tests. Should those be adjusted as well?
Yes, I will take care of that soon. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Law <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 9:47 PM To: Li, Pan2 <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Chen, Ken <[email protected]>; Liu, Hongtao <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Disable uint128_t testcase of SAT_MUL when rv32 On 7/7/25 9:48 PM, Li, Pan2 wrote: >> Is that correct? Don't you need to be testing that the platform has >> vector in addition to being rv64? > > It is riscv.exp test, so I think vector extension is not required here. Oh, I see. We're not actually turning on RVV anywhere. OK for the trunk. It looks like there's ~200 uses of risc_v in dg-do run clauses in the "sat" subdirectory tests. Should those be adjusted as well? jeff
