On 12-08-15 11:44 , Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Jan Kratochvil wrote:It is a needless violation of C++ resolving rules.It's not needless as the examples here show. gdb is about helping people debug their stuff, not about language lawyering.
Agreed. If I'm passing a numeric pointer constant, I'm already past the bleeding edge. I don't want gdb to get in the way. If the inferior call crashes, I get to keep both pieces.
Thanks. Diego.
