Hi, On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Like the following, only the coverage.c use is converted. I've never > seen template function arguments anywhere and having to repeat them all > over the place is really really ugly (yes, even if only in the > implementation). > > This goes with static member functions and not wrapping any data. It > goes away with the requirement of having externally visible global > functions for the hash/compare functions as well (which was ugly > anyway). > > Comments? Well, it looks nicer than what's there currently. As the element functions now are scoped and normal member functions, they should be named with lower case characters of course. I do like that the hash table would then only have one real template argument; the Allocator, well, no better idea comes to my mind. Ciao, Michael.
