On 14/08/2012 07:03, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: >> ... but I have the feeling that this makes (*code) unreachable and that >> that's wrong. Shouldn't it be "root->next = *code;" ? > > No. That caused the regression that I mentioned. (*code) is > resolved, at entry. resolve_code steps on to (*code)->next. > Yes, OK. Double pointers are really on the limits of my spirit.
Mikael
