Hi Thomas,
thanks for the ok. Unfortunately does the patch regress in gomp (test case
gomp/pr104382 when I am not mistaken ; the one with the lone 'save'
statement). This was reported by the regression testing host at first for
arm, but also occurs on x86_64. Since when are proposed patches checked by
a CI? That's fantastic!
I will continue to investigate how to fix that issue.
Regards,
Andre
Andre Vehreschild * ve...@gmx.de
Am 2. Juni 2025 20:10:06 schrieb Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de>:
Hi Andre,
attached patch fixes a missing substring ref on a saved allocatable string.
The issue seems to be, that the variable is declared to be a character pointer
and not a character array. When using the latter (why not), it works as
expected and does not produce any regressions.
Regtests ok on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu / F41. Ok for mainlines?
OK for trunk and also for backporting to gcc 15 (it is a 15/16
regression).
Best regards
Thomas
