On Mon, 26 May 2025, Richard Biener wrote:

> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 2:31 PM Alexander Monakov <amona...@ispras.ru> wrote:
> >
> > In PR 105965 we accepted a request to form FMA instructions when the
> > source code is using a narrow generic vector that contains just one
> > element, corresponding to V1SF or V1DF mode, while the backend does not
> > expand fma patterns for such modes.
> >
> > For this to work under -ffp-contract=on, we either need to modify
> > backends, or emulate such degenerate-vector FMA via scalar FMA in
> > tree-vect-generic.  Do the latter.
> 
> Can you instead apply the lowering during gimplification?  That is because
> having an unsupported internal-function in the IL the user could not have
> emitted directly is somewhat bad.  I thought the vector lowering could
> be generalized for more single-argument internal functions but then no
> such unsupported calls should exist in the first place.

Sure, like below?  Not fully tested yet.

-- 8< --

>From 4caee92434d9425912979b285725166b22f40a87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Monakov <amona...@ispras.ru>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 18:35:45 +0300
Subject: [PATCH v2] allow contraction to synthetic single-element vector FMA

In PR 105965 we accepted a request to form FMA instructions when the
source code is using a narrow generic vector that contains just one
element, corresponding to V1SF or V1DF mode, while the backend does not
expand fma patterns for such modes.

For this to work under -ffp-contract=on, we either need to modify
backends, or emulate such degenerate-vector FMA via scalar FMA.
Do the latter, in gimplification hook together with contraction.

gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:

        * c-gimplify.cc (fma_supported_p): Allow forming single-element
        vector FMA when scalar FMA is available.
        (c_gimplify_expr): Allow vector types.
---
 gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.cc | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.cc
index c6fb764656..6c313287e6 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.cc
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-gimplify.cc
@@ -870,12 +870,28 @@ c_build_bind_expr (location_t loc, tree block, tree body)
   return bind;
 }
 
+enum fma_expansion
+{
+  FMA_NONE,
+  FMA_DIRECT,
+  FMA_VEC1_SYNTHETIC
+};
+
 /* Helper for c_gimplify_expr: test if target supports fma-like FN.  */
 
-static bool
+static fma_expansion
 fma_supported_p (enum internal_fn fn, tree type)
 {
-  return direct_internal_fn_supported_p (fn, type, OPTIMIZE_FOR_BOTH);
+  if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (fn, type, OPTIMIZE_FOR_BOTH))
+    return FMA_DIRECT;
+  /* Accept single-element vector FMA (see PR 105965) when the
+     backend handles the scalar but not the vector mode.  */
+  if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type)
+      && known_eq (TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (type),  1U)
+      && direct_internal_fn_supported_p (fn, TREE_TYPE (type),
+                                        OPTIMIZE_FOR_BOTH))
+    return FMA_VEC1_SYNTHETIC;
+  return FMA_NONE;
 }
 
 /* Gimplification of expression trees.  */
@@ -936,13 +952,14 @@ c_gimplify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p 
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
     case MINUS_EXPR:
       {
        tree type = TREE_TYPE (*expr_p);
+       enum fma_expansion how;
        /* For -ffp-contract=on we need to attempt FMA contraction only
           during initial gimplification.  Late contraction across statement
           boundaries would violate language semantics.  */
-       if (SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (type)
+       if ((SCALAR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (type) || VECTOR_FLOAT_TYPE_P (type))
            && flag_fp_contract_mode == FP_CONTRACT_ON
            && cfun && !(cfun->curr_properties & PROP_gimple_any)
-           && fma_supported_p (IFN_FMA, type))
+           && (how = fma_supported_p (IFN_FMA, type)) != FMA_NONE)
          {
            bool neg_mul = false, neg_add = code == MINUS_EXPR;
 
@@ -973,7 +990,7 @@ c_gimplify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p 
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
            enum internal_fn ifn = IFN_FMA;
            if (neg_mul)
              {
-               if (fma_supported_p (IFN_FNMA, type))
+               if ((how = fma_supported_p (IFN_FNMA, type)) != FMA_NONE)
                  ifn = IFN_FNMA;
                else
                  ops[0] = build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, type, ops[0]);
@@ -981,21 +998,34 @@ c_gimplify_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple_seq *pre_p 
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
            if (neg_add)
              {
                enum internal_fn ifn2 = ifn == IFN_FMA ? IFN_FMS : IFN_FNMS;
-               if (fma_supported_p (ifn2, type))
+               if ((how = fma_supported_p (ifn2, type)) != FMA_NONE)
                  ifn = ifn2;
                else
                  ops[2] = build1 (NEGATE_EXPR, type, ops[2]);
              }
            /* Avoid gimplify_arg: it emits all side effects into *PRE_P.  */
            for (auto &&op : ops)
-             if (gimplify_expr (&op, pre_p, post_p, is_gimple_val, fb_rvalue)
-                 == GS_ERROR)
-               return GS_ERROR;
+             {
+               if (how == FMA_VEC1_SYNTHETIC)
+                 op = build1 (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (type), op);
+               if (gimplify_expr (&op, pre_p, post_p, is_gimple_val, fb_rvalue)
+                   == GS_ERROR)
+                 return GS_ERROR;
+             }
 
            gcall *call = gimple_build_call_internal_vec (ifn, ops);
            gimple_seq_add_stmt_without_update (pre_p, call);
            *expr_p = create_tmp_var (type);
-           gimple_call_set_lhs (call, *expr_p);
+           if (how == FMA_DIRECT)
+             gimple_call_set_lhs (call, *expr_p);
+           else
+             {
+               tree lhs = create_tmp_var (TREE_TYPE (type));
+               gimple_call_set_lhs (call, lhs);
+               tree ctor = build_constructor_single (type, 0, lhs);
+               gimple *g = gimple_build_assign (*expr_p, CONSTRUCTOR, ctor);
+               gimple_seq_add_stmt_without_update (pre_p, g);
+             }
            return GS_ALL_DONE;
          }
        break;
-- 
2.49.0

Reply via email to