Argh, I see what's going on here. This was bootstrapped and tested on Windows, so the failure currently breaking Linux builds slipped right under me. I'll spin up a patch to fix the build failure pronto. Sorry about that.
best regards, Julian On Tue, 6 May 2025, 17:11 Sam James, <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Julian Waters <tanksherma...@gmail.com> writes: > > > gcc bootstrap works on my end pretty well, but you know what they say, > > no one likes an "It works on my device" developer :) > > The reason he asked is https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches (it's > convention to state how you tested it & on what platforms) and whether > there were any testsuite regressions. > > Anyway, looks like this introduced > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-regression/20250506083108.the83%25haoch...@gnu-skx-1.sc.intel.com/ > . > > > > > In all seriousness, no observable problems were seen on my end, apart > > from all the existing ucrt64 programs failing to run because of the > > libstdc++ issue. I believe Liu Hao's patch should fix that, those > > installed packages will need a recompile afterwards to run properly > > again. > > > > best regards, > > Julian > > > > On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:20 PM Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 5/2/25 9:59 AM, Julian Waters wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > After a long hiatus, I've returned to address review comments on > >> > the Windows TLS patch. Attached here is the final patch from this > >> > effort. Ok for merge? Will need help from Windows maintainers to > >> > commit once this is approved. > >> > > >> > best regards, > >> > Julian > >> > > >> Patch looks OK to me, have you tried bootstrapping gcc as a test? > >> > >> >
