On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:03 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 1 May 2025 17:01:16 CEST, Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com> wrote: > >While looking into bitwise optimizations, I noticed that > >get_known_nonzero_bits_1 does `bm.value () & ~bm.mask ()` which > >is ok except it creates a temporary wide_int. Instead if we > >use wi::bit_and_not, we can avoid the temporary and on some > > > did you look, by chance, if there are other such spots?
No, I have not looked. I just happened to come across this one while working on some other unrelated optimization. Thanks, Andrew > > just curious > thanks
