On Sat, May 3, 2025 at 1:44 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 01:32:35PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > Any reason for unsigned long long vs. uint64_t for the following? > > > > - size_t attr; // See cbl_field_attr_t > > + unsigned long long attr; // See cbl_field_attr_t > > Because it needs to be handled the same by the compiler, and it was easier > to use ULONGLONG, "attr" than figure out what exact type uint64_t has. > The C FE has > if (UINT64_TYPE) > c_uint64_type_node = uint64_type_node = > TREE_TYPE (identifier_global_value (c_get_ident (UINT64_TYPE))); > but the COBOL FE doesn't have that. > For aliasing etc. reasons I'm afraid we can't use > build_nonstandard_integer_type (64, 1);
Ah, I was hoping the stdint type nodes were initialized by the middle-end. Richard. > > Jakub >
