On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Ping, since it sounds from irc like the release is coming soon :)
Fine with me.
> Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> writes:
> > gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-8.c fails on aarch64 for the reasons discussed
> > in the PR trail. The fix didn't make it into GCC 15, so this patch
> > XFAILs the test instead.
> >
> > Other targets might benefit from an XFAIL too, but people who work on
> > those targets would be better placed to know the right conditions.
> >
> > Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu. OK for GCC 15?
> >
> > FWIW, I was holding off on doing this in case the patch did make it in.
> > With the patch applied, I get clean results locally on aarch64-linux-gnu
> > for all testsuites except libphobos, where the some math routines are
> > missing AArch64 support.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/
> > PR tree-optimization/118407
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-8.c: Add XFAIL for aarch64.
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-8.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-8.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-8.c
> > index dcddf573145..22e4882c363 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-8.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/predcom-8.c
> > @@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ int is_sorted(int *a, int n)
> > }
> >
> > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "Executing predictive commoning without
> > unrolling" "pcom" } } */
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Invalid sum" "pcom" } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Invalid sum" "pcom" { xfail
> > aarch64*-*-* } } } */
>
--
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
