On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 01:14:51PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> what about trunk then? Right now, cobol still doesn't build there on
> Solaris/amd64 because 3 patches are missing:
>
> cobol: Don't require GLOB_BRACE etc. [PR119217]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680675.html
>
> Still unreviewed.
>
> cobol: Initialize regmatch_t portably [PR119217]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680676.html
>
> Unclear how exactly to handle this.
>
> cobol: Allow for undefined NAME_MAX [PR119217]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/680682.html
>
> Should go for a variant simply replacing NAME_MAX by its Linux
> <limits.h> value (255) until the whole struct cbl_function_t.name thing
> can be resolved. Already tested on Linux/x86_64 and Solaris/amd64.
>
> libgcobol does build on Solaris (at least on trunk) since
>
> commit a619a128c992b2121a862b8470960ae751d25db6
> Author: Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
> Date: Mon Apr 21 15:59:14 2025 +0200
>
> libgcobol: Check for struct tm tm_zone
I think your patch should go to trunk for now as well and then like for 15.2
we can gradually extend or remove the whitelists as it is tested on more
hosts and targets and confirmed to work reasonably well.
Jakub
